Quantcast
Channel: Mark Anderson – The Truth Hound
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 172

Mrs. Clinton’s Anti-TPP Charade

$
0
0

Hillary ‘said’ she opposes trade treaty, so it must be true!

Hillary in one of many speeches to the CFR. Photo: ThinkTankWatch.org
Hillary in one of many speeches to the CFR. Photo: ThinkTankWatch.com

By The Truth Hound

Just how pathetic the U.S. press has become can be seen in the servile way that media nimrods passively accept some politician’s word on something, even though it’s painfully elementary for any reporter worth his salt to operate on the premise that, often, political people only say what people want to hear.

This aspect of human nature is well known to everyone—except to most modern reporters.

With that in mind, we now come to Hillary Clinton. Bear with me a moment.

Yours Truly was passing through Arkansas July 29 and spotted the day’s edition of the establishment Arkansas Democrat Gazette, which carried a front-page report on some news you may have missed: An Arkansas Delegate was thrown out of the Democratic National Convention—simply for hoisting a sign near the stage front emblazoned with the forbidden words: “No TPP.”

What a cad! How dare he exercise free speech! What was he thinking?

The late George Orwell’s insightful point that “free speech is the freedom to say what people don’t want to hear” is lost on the delusional dorks who over-populate the nation’s newsrooms and its political parties.

The TPP, of course, is the Trans Pacific Partnership, a trade-investment-banking-corporate-profit-protection scheme which represents the largest such multilateral treaty in human history. It involves 12 nations, from New Zealand, to Canada, to Mexico, to South American states.

If the 20-year-old NAFTA treaty was and still is bad, and it is, then the TPP is far worse. The same goes for the 10-year-old Central American Free Trade Agreement, or CAFTA. All such treaties are instruments under which Congress, having voted to approve the “agreements,” basically surrenders its constitutionally required duty to regulate trade to transnational bodies, complete with private court tribunals.

Regarding the ouster of the sign-holder, the Democrat Gazette noted: “Frank Klein of Mount Ida was stripped of his credentials by the state delegation for holding aloft a placard opposing a trade agreement [the TPP] favored by the Obama administration.”

There was another First Amendment problem. The newspaper added: “[Bernie Sanders] delegate Jason Thompson of Russellville, Ark., said officials threatened to eject him twice . . . after he waved [his own anti-TPP sign] and made comments to a reporter that were viewed as anti-Hillary Clinton. Clinton, a former secretary of state, opposes the proposed trade agreement.” [Emphasis added]

Response: NO SHE DOESN’T!!!

We must remember, this is the dominant newspaper in the very state in which the Clintons  first orchestrated their decades-long power play, which put one Clinton in the White House and threatens to put his spouse in there. The Clintons’ rampage across the political landscape was built on scores of scandals, treason (Chinagate) and some strange deaths, including that of White House counsel Vince Foster, a longtime friend and associate of the Clintons. How could the Democrat-Gazette, having been so close to the “Clintonistas,” be such a simpleton as to take Hillary’s anti-TPP claim at face value?

Besides, why didn’t Hillary send word to re-admit Mr. Klein? Why didn’t she respond in a manner that would lend a little credence to shallow media claims that she’s all about free speech and against the TPP?

The reason is that Hillary supports the TPP. She always has. And she always will. Anyone who doesn’t “get” that is way beyond uninformed.

I will continually repeat that Hillary is a Democrat in name only. In reality, she’s a loyal member of the trans-national establishment which operates as a shadow government on behalf of world banks and other entrenched power players who’ve designed a private governance network all their own. The trade agreements are a key part of their infrastructure, although its core is the private central banking system that cornered money-creation (and engaged in grand larceny by stealing the people’s credit) and lends to governments and individuals at interest.

The real Hillary is the one who often speaks to the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), which serves as a bridge between the one-tenth of 1% plutocratic-investor class and government policy. The CFR thus stridently supports the TPP and related pacts and is the U.S. portion of the world policy-planning politburo that supplies carefully-placed personnel and policy “studies” to the government.

Hillary also has spoken to the CFR’s philosophical sibling in the UK—the Royal Institute of International Affairs (Chatham House). And her string of speeches to the high flyers of finance for around $250,000 per speech, including the pro-trade Goldman Sachs firm, further illustrate her real leanings and allegiances.

Mrs. Clinton had frequently praised the massive TPP agreement pushed by Democratic President Obama and many of the Republicans in Congress, but she flip-flopped and verbally “opposed” the TPP after losing political ground to her former rival for the Democratic nod, Sen. Bernie Sanders.

Yet, the Washington Free Beacon, via a You Tube posting, came up with 24 speeches Mrs. Clinton gave as secretary of state in which she highlighted and praised the TPP negotiations. That included two CFR speeches, a speech to the Foreign Policy Group, another to the Center for Strategic and International Studies, and two others to the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation group.

“It’s no wonder that with all of her flip-flopping on TPP, she and her allies at the State Department wouldn’t want the public to see her email correspondence on the [TPP] deal,” the news site www.Lifezette.com remarked, in its discussion of one key reason why details of Hillary’s apparently treasonous email scandal have been kept in the shadows, even while she’s allowed to reach for the presidency without indictment.

Instead of Hillary paying any price at all for her multiple misdeeds, a guy is thrown out of a convention simply for speaking his mind while another is threatened with being ousted, in a nation that says it’s for free speech. That claim sounds about as reliable as Hillary saying she opposes the TPP.

 

 

 


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 172

Trending Articles