Quantcast
Channel: Mark Anderson – The Truth Hound
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 172

Brexit’s Dark Side: Brits Get ‘No Quarter’ From EU–Well into the Future

$
0
0
Former London Mayor and likely new PM Boris Johnson (left), shown with Jacob Rothschild.
Former London Mayor and likely new PM Boris Johnson (left), shown with Jacob Rothschild.

Only well-informed populace can enable Brexit ‘divorce’ to become final

By THE TRUTH HOUND

Yours Truly has learned that while, on June 23, the overall UK did vote 51.9% to 48.9% to leave the European Union in the much-anticipated “Brexit” referendum, there is considerable fragility and uncertainty surrounding the whole matter.

As reported elsewhere on this blog, two days after the UK filed for divorce from the EU, RT news claimed that “over 2 million Brits” signed an online petition calling for a second vote, as many feel “dissatisfied” with the referendum’s outcome. That number supposedly was quickly increasing as this article was posted.

And given the plutocratic plans already in motion regarding the transatlantic trade treaty, the European Union military’s formation and the advancement of the global cities-global mayoral movement that represents phony local control, a meaningful, complete British exit from the EU may be painfully slow, and may never happen.

Notably, the apparent difference with the EU army structure is that the UK—which remains a part of the EU military apparatus regardless of Brexit’s approval—will have even less say-so over its military assets and policies under the EU than under NATO.

In other words, the UK’s sovereignty, seemingly boosted by Brexit’s approval, is being diminished militarily—and also economically, since, as this writer has already reported, British Prime Minister David Cameron, whose government has sent representatives to the Bilderberg meetings to fine-tune the global “consensus,” has been visiting several European leaders to “renegotiate” Britain’s relationship with the EU.

That produced a report whose essence is “the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) is at the heart of British trade policy,” said UKcolumn.org co-editor Mike Robinson. His careful assessment of Brexit’s outcome differs greatly from that of the manipulative mainstream media.

So, that leaves the question of British political autonomy open. Notably, Brexit’s approval is dependent on the Lisbon Treaty’s Article 50 process. The Truth Hound checked Article 50 and found that leaving the EU will take at least two years and may take longer. And the exit is largely at the mercy of the EU apparatus.

EuroNews.com, in its own Article 50 overview, found the same thing: “It will take about two years to officially ‘leave’ the EU, however, most experts predict a longer period. During this negotiation process, EU laws will still apply to the UK—it will continue to participate in other EU business but will not participate in internal EU discussions or decisions on its own withdrawal.”

And, as many expected, Cameron resigned upon Brexit’s approval, while calling for a “period of stability”—seen by some as a delaying tactic—while commenting, “It should be up to the next Prime Minister to decide when to activate Article 50.”

Former London Mayor Boris Johnson, who’s been playing the role of an anti-Brexit “populist,” is suspected of having been a fake friend of the UK’s referendum to depart the EU. Astute observers believe the deck has been stacked so Johnson will be named the next Prime Minister.

Texas A&M-educated economist Dick Eastman sees Johnson as a Zionist-leaning friend of the Rothschild clique who has been tasked to lead an “exit” with such “fine-print” rules that, in the end, being “out” of the EU will function much like being in it. Supporters of real change could be crowded out and shouted down by the media-government alliance, especially the BBC.

Brexit nevertheless is a positive first step to build upon, but media efforts to complicate Brexit’s implementation will likely foster frustration, leading to uprisings and mayhem so as to “spoil the spirit” of Brexit and make people beg to reverse it. But, according to UK Column co-producer Brian Gerrish, if those who supported Brexit can be aided in understanding the effects of the ruling establishment’s “hidden hand,” Brexit would have a chance at real success.

Yet, amid all this, there’s also a deceptive power “devolution” happening that ties into the global cities movement that Bilderberg and other entities in the supranational governance network have been molding.

Some of it sounds good on the surface, as devolution could mean more authority for national assemblies within the UK.

However, that devolution extends down to the city level, where realignments are being made through various entities touting the “global cities” mantra. (See related story in this edition—Ed.). The Global Parliament of Mayors is central in this vanguard toward a seamless, forcible one-world society from the bottom up—while the EU army and TTIP work from the top down, resembling a pincer strategy.

Thus, while the UK people’s voice was expressed in an historical vote, the embedded powers have their own plans. Yet, the answer always ultimately lies in exiting the usurious, debt-based money system that gives leverage to groupings like the EU and its backers, and makes the world a prison without bars. In other words, we need “Monexit,” leading to economic democracy.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 172

Trending Articles